1998
DOI: 10.1080/003655498750003546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Risk Factors and Outcome in Patients with Enterococcus faecalis vs Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia

Abstract: The purpose of our study was to determine retrospectively the risk factors for the acquisition of Enterococcus faecalis vs E. faecium bacteraemia, as well as the clinical outcomes of these patients. 62 patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia were compared to 31 patients with E. faecium bacteraemia. Haematologic malignancies, neutropenia, high-risk source and previous use of aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins and clindamycin were significantly associated with E. faecium bacteraemia. Instead, u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, and in line with some previous reports, we found no association between E. faecium BSI and increased mortality [8,9,14,28]. Interestingly, some in vitro studies have suggested that enterococcal virulence determinants are more frequently found in E.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our study, and in line with some previous reports, we found no association between E. faecium BSI and increased mortality [8,9,14,28]. Interestingly, some in vitro studies have suggested that enterococcal virulence determinants are more frequently found in E.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Most VRE isolates were Enterococcus faecium , whereas the VSE isolates were predominantly E. faecalis. To account for this difference, factors associated with VSE bacteraemia due to E. faecium (haematological malignancy and duration of neutropenia) and E. faecalis (urinary catheter use) [44], were included in the multivariable analysis. We also accounted for time at risk for enterococcal bacteraemia by adjusting in the multivariable analyses for the following factors occurring in the 30 days prior to bacteraemia (for VRE and VSE cases) and death or discharge (for controls): number of days of antibiotic administration, neutropenia and hypoalbuminaemia, and use of medical devices (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%