2018
DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.01.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Of Retrograde, Primary And Secondary Bonding Materials With Tooth Substance

Abstract: MTA is equivalent to vitremer in preventing microleakage when used as retrograde filling material.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MTA is a bioactive material that is biocompatible, radiopaque, has low solubility, and induces dentin bridge formation. MTA has lighter inflammation after capping the pulp, causing less congestion and necrosis, and the sealing performance is significantly better than calcium hydroxide, with high hardness and small microleakage when compared with calcium hydroxide [35][36][37][38]. Wen et al [39] examined the calcified bridge by tissue biopsy of 30, 60 and 90 days after direct pulp capping of 30 orthodontic premolars with MTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTA is a bioactive material that is biocompatible, radiopaque, has low solubility, and induces dentin bridge formation. MTA has lighter inflammation after capping the pulp, causing less congestion and necrosis, and the sealing performance is significantly better than calcium hydroxide, with high hardness and small microleakage when compared with calcium hydroxide [35][36][37][38]. Wen et al [39] examined the calcified bridge by tissue biopsy of 30, 60 and 90 days after direct pulp capping of 30 orthodontic premolars with MTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%