Comparison of retrieved Noctilucent cloud particle properties from Odin tomography scans and model simulations

Abstract

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Mesospheric ice particles, known as Noctilucent clouds or Polar Mesospheric Clouds, have long been observed by rocket instruments and satellites, while models have been used to simulate ice particle growth and cloud properties. However, the fact that different measurement techniques are sensitive to different parts of the ice particle distribution makes it difficult to compare retrieved parameters such as ice particle radius or particle number density from different experiments. In this work we investigate the accuracy of satellite retrieval based on scattered light and how this affects derived cloud properties. We run the retrieval algorithm on modelled cloud distributions and compare the results to the properties of the original distributions. We find that ice mass density is accurately retrieved whereas mean radius often is overestimated and high number densities generally are underestimated. The reason is that the retrieval algorithm assumes a Gaussian size distribution, whereas the modelled size distributions often are multimodal. Once we know the limits of the satellite retrieval we proceed to compare the properties retrieved from the modelled cloud distributions to those observed by the Optical, Spectroscopic, and Infrared Remote Imaging System (OSIRIS) instrument on the Odin satellite. We find that a model with a stationary atmosphere, as given by average atmospheric conditions, does not yield cloud properties that are in agreement with the observations, whereas a model with realistic temperature and vertical wind variations does. This indicates that average atmospheric conditions are insufficient to understand the process of Noctilucent cloud growth and that a realistic atmospheric variability is crucial for cloud formation and growth. Further, the agreement between results from the model – when set up with a realistically variable atmosphere – and the observations suggests that our understanding of the growth process itself is reasonable.</p>