The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1134/s1061830908010075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of results of measuring the magnetic field of a crack by flux-gate meters with calculated data obtained within a model of constant magnetic charge density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, measurement of the imaginary part as described by was effective, compared to the directly measured magnetic field or phase change independently. Many numerical and experimental estimations for defect characterization have been reported [2][3][4][5], and the detailed spatial distribution of the magnetic flux leakage using theoretical models such as the magnetic dipole has been discussed. In this paper, we evaluated the imaginary part of the y-component for estimating the cylindrical shape of the flaws using the low magnetization method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, measurement of the imaginary part as described by was effective, compared to the directly measured magnetic field or phase change independently. Many numerical and experimental estimations for defect characterization have been reported [2][3][4][5], and the detailed spatial distribution of the magnetic flux leakage using theoretical models such as the magnetic dipole has been discussed. In this paper, we evaluated the imaginary part of the y-component for estimating the cylindrical shape of the flaws using the low magnetization method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate and inspect flaws in metallic materials using electromagnetic methods, various measurement methods, such as eddy current testing (ECT) [1], MFL [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], remote field testing (RFT) [9], magnetic particle inspection (MPI) and pulsed eddy current (PEC) [10], have been developed. These techniques are categorized into the two methods of eddy current and magnetic flux leakage measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%