2012
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of resident and mid-level provider productivity and patient satisfaction in an emergency department fast track

Abstract: In a low acuity area of the ED, MLPs treated more patients per hour and generated more RVUs per hour than EM resident physicians. However, resident physicians generated more RVUs per patient. Patient satisfaction did not differ.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,10,11 Although the clinical value of residents compared to midlevel providers remains unknown in neurology, comparisons in emergency medicine and primary care suggest similar clinical value. [26][27][28] Our study explores some of the ways that departments and programs employ their new and existing faculty to assist with the loss of resident work, finding that faculties are frequently assisting residents in leading family meetings. This may have unintended consequences on the value of resident education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,10,11 Although the clinical value of residents compared to midlevel providers remains unknown in neurology, comparisons in emergency medicine and primary care suggest similar clinical value. [26][27][28] Our study explores some of the ways that departments and programs employ their new and existing faculty to assist with the loss of resident work, finding that faculties are frequently assisting residents in leading family meetings. This may have unintended consequences on the value of resident education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calculation used prior data on the same MLPs’ productivity extrapolated from low-acuity shifts at another site 8. Data were analysed using the two-tailed t test to compare pt/h, RVU/h, RVU/pt and daily census between the two groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the research on innovative staffing models is still evolving, the existing evidence indicates that utilizing nurse practitioners or physician assistants as part of the overall ED health care team can have positive effects on both patient flow 82,83 and patient satisfaction. [84][85][86] Although a certain percentage of pediatric patients are acutely ill or injured, many patients are of lower acuity and arrive during predictable peak periods, most notably during evening and weekend hours. The use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in lower-acuity settings during peak hours, for example, has been found to be particularly effective at alleviating the stress that highervolume, lower-acuity patients have on the system.…”
Section: Innovative Staffing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wait times are known to be a key factor in patient satisfaction, and studies have shown that patient satisfaction scores are often lowest among the lower-acuity patients. 84 The low-acuity environment has, therefore, become a focus for innovative care solutions that can reduce wait times for all patients, not just those with minor presentations. 98 A systematic search of the English and French literature included 66 papers on the use of physician assistants in EDs and studied several outcomes, including changes in patient flow and patient satisfaction, during the period of physician assistant utilization.…”
Section: Innovative Staffing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%