Comparison of Representative Microservices Technologies in Terms of Performance for Use for Projects Based on Sensor Networks

Abstract

Reading and analyzing data from sensors are crucial in many areas of life. IoT concepts and related issues are becoming more and more popular, but before we can process data and draw conclusions, we need to think about how to design an application. The most popular solutions today are microservices and monolithic architecture. In addition to this choice, there is also the question of the technology in which you will work. There are more and more of them on the market and in each of them it is practically possible to achieve similar results, but the difference lies in how quickly it will be possible and whether the approach invented will turn out to be the most optimal. Making the right decisions at the beginning of application development can determine its path to success or failure. The main goal of this article was to compare technologies used in applications based on microservice architecture. The preparation of a book lending system, whose server part was implemented in three different versions, each using a different type of technology, helped to achieve this goal. The compared solutions were: Spring Boot, Micronaut and Quarkus. The reason for this research was to investigate projects using sensor networks, ranging from telemedicine applications to extensive sensor networks collecting scientific data, or working in an environment with limited resources, e.g., with BLE or WIFI transmitters, where it is critical to supply energy to these transmitters. Therefore, the issue of efficiency and hence energy savings may be a key issue depending on the selected programming technology.

Enhancing Corporate Security: A Microservices Approach to Monitoring with Spyware Techniques and Prediction Models

“…For example, the article "A Performance Comparison of Spring Boot and Quarkus for Microservices" [58] compares the performance of the two frameworks in a microservices application, concluding that Quarkus shows better results in all benchmarks, including startup time, response time, and memory consumption.…”

Design and Implementation of a Cloud PACS Architecture

“…They assume self-management and light weight. They are expected to be independent and responsible for single functions [ 51 ]. Microservice-based systems can take full advantage of the cloud-delivery model [ 52 ].…”