2005
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of renal allograft fibrosis after transplantation from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors

Abstract: Despite high rates of delayed graft function secondary to a prolonged warm ischaemia time, NHBD kidneys do not appear to be more susceptible to the development of renal allograft fibrosis. This study supports the growing body of evidence that kidneys from NHBDs are an acceptable alternative to those from HBDs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a similar incidence and severity of interstitial fibrosis in surveillance biopsies from living-and deceased-donor kidneys was found, challenging the impact of injury related to brain death and/or prolonged preservation (14). In addition, protocol biopsies of kidneys from a heartbeating or non-heart-beating donor revealed no significant difference in quantitative Sirius red staining in relation to prolonged periods of warm ischemia (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, a similar incidence and severity of interstitial fibrosis in surveillance biopsies from living-and deceased-donor kidneys was found, challenging the impact of injury related to brain death and/or prolonged preservation (14). In addition, protocol biopsies of kidneys from a heartbeating or non-heart-beating donor revealed no significant difference in quantitative Sirius red staining in relation to prolonged periods of warm ischemia (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A study from the authors' unit found no difference in the levels of fibrosis between NHBD and HBD kidneys 11 . However, this was based only on biopsies taken up to 12 months after transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The use of marginal donors is usually met with skepticism and subject to generalization and inappropriate The negative impact of donor vasculopathy has been stressed in some studies (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) although questioned by others (25). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%