2020 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ecce44975.2020.9236066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Reluctance and Surface Permanent Magnet Coaxial Magnetic Gears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as revealed in ref. [35], although the reluctance FMMG carrying less magnets is theoretically expected to perform better than the ordinary FMMG in terms of PM gravimetric torque density, the former in reality may require more magnets than those of the latter to produce the same torque since the drop in torque generation outweighs the reduction in PM cost.…”
Section: Development Of the Field‐modulated Magnetic Gearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as revealed in ref. [35], although the reluctance FMMG carrying less magnets is theoretically expected to perform better than the ordinary FMMG in terms of PM gravimetric torque density, the former in reality may require more magnets than those of the latter to produce the same torque since the drop in torque generation outweighs the reduction in PM cost.…”
Section: Development Of the Field‐modulated Magnetic Gearmentioning
confidence: 99%