Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics 2003 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044046-0.50259-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of regularizations of vortex sheet motion

Abstract: This paper presents a numerical comparison of two regularizations of the Euler equations, namely, the vortex blob regularization and regularization by physical viscosity. The initial condition is a flat vortex sheet whose vorticity has been smoothed by convolution. The sheet rolls up into a vortex pair. We compute the frequency of oscillations in the core vorticity and scale it using results for a semi-infinite vortex sheet. The computations indicate that as the smoothing parameter δ and the viscosity ν decrea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we use a split method in time in which advection is treated using a semi-Lagrangian scheme, diffusion is treated with a three-level Crank-Nicholson method, and all finite difference and interpolation approximations are of fourth order. The method uses ideas from several previous works, including Staniforth & Côté (1991), E & Liu (1996), Johnston & Krasny (2002), Luchini & Tognaccini (2002), Seaid (2002) and Nitsche, Taylor & Krasny (2003). It is of second order for the present highly singular flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here, we use a split method in time in which advection is treated using a semi-Lagrangian scheme, diffusion is treated with a three-level Crank-Nicholson method, and all finite difference and interpolation approximations are of fourth order. The method uses ideas from several previous works, including Staniforth & Côté (1991), E & Liu (1996), Johnston & Krasny (2002), Luchini & Tognaccini (2002), Seaid (2002) and Nitsche, Taylor & Krasny (2003). It is of second order for the present highly singular flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But prior to our work the mathematically rigorous construction of algebraic spiral flows was unsuccessful; see [12,19,23] for various attempts and insights. Even numerical approximation is notoriously difficult and unstable [13,20,21,22]. Since our initial data is self-similar, one would expect self-similar solutions as well, and indeed [11] show: Remark 2.…”
Section: Main Results Theorem ([11]) Consider the 2d Incompressible Ementioning
confidence: 91%