2018
DOI: 10.3133/sir20185066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of regression relations of bankfull discharge and channel geometry for the glaciated and nonglaciated settings of Pennsylvania and southern New York

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment-visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak flows with 100-yr return period are used as the inflow boundary condition. Channel bathymetry is estimated using regional, hydraulic-geometry scaling relationships from previous studies (Cinotto 2003;Chaplin 2005;Clune et al 2018;Roland and Hoffman 2011). We use a constant Manning's roughness value of 0.045 for both the channel and floodplain.…”
Section: E Flood Inundation Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak flows with 100-yr return period are used as the inflow boundary condition. Channel bathymetry is estimated using regional, hydraulic-geometry scaling relationships from previous studies (Cinotto 2003;Chaplin 2005;Clune et al 2018;Roland and Hoffman 2011). We use a constant Manning's roughness value of 0.045 for both the channel and floodplain.…”
Section: E Flood Inundation Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ran the model using different DEM resolutions (3, 10, and 30 m), with a sub-grid-scale representation of stream channels 65 at the HUC-12 catchment level. To estimate the channel geometry, we used bankfull channel dimensions from regional hydraulic-geometry scaling relationships 66 . This approach is reasonable when channel bathymetry data are not available 67,68 .…”
Section: Configuration Of the Hydrodynamic Flood Inundation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is reasonable when channel bathymetry data are not available 67,68 . The hydraulic-geometry relationships accounted for the difference in channel dimensions between streams underlain by carbonate and noncarbonate rocks 66 . Using the DEM "burning" approach as well as data (crest level and geometric attributes) from the NLD 30 , levees were incorporated into the hydrodynamic model 29,69 .…”
Section: Configuration Of the Hydrodynamic Flood Inundation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%