Comparison of Refractive Outcomes and Optical Zone Decentration After SMILE Between Patients With Symmetrical and Asymmetrical High Astigmatism

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the refractive outcomes and optical zone decentration between patients with symmetrical and asymmetrical high astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: This was a prospective analysis of 89 patients (152 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism of more than 2.00 diopters (D) treated with the SMILE procedure. There were 69 eyes with asymmetrical topographies (asymmetrical astigmatism group) and 83 eyes with symmetrical topographies (symmetrical astigmatism group). Decentralization values were assessed using the tangential curvature difference map preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Decentration, visual refractive outcomes, and induced changes in corneal wavefront aberrations were compared between the two groups 6 months postoperatively. Results: Both groups achieved favorable visual and refractive outcomes, with a mean postoperative cylinder of −0.22 ± 0.23 and −0.20 ± 0.21 D in the asymmetrical and symmetrical astigmatism groups, respectively. In addition, visual and refractive outcomes and induced changes in corneal aberrations were comparable between the asymmetrical and symmetrical astigmatism groups (all P > .05). However, the total and vertical decentration in the asymmetrical astigmatism group was greater than that in the symmetrical astigmatism group (all P < .05), whereas no significant differences were found in the values of horizontal decentration between the two groups ( P > .05). There was a weak positive correlation between induced total corneal higher order aberrations and total decentration ( r = 0.267, P = .026) in the asymmetrical astigmatism group but not in the symmetrical astigmatism group ( r = 0.210, P = .056). Conclusions: An asymmetrical corneal surface might affect treatment centration after SMILE. Subclinical decentration may be associated with the induction of total higher order aberrations, but it did not affect high astigmatic correction or induced corneal aberrations. [ J Refract Surg . 2023;39(4):273–280.]

Comparison of early visual outcomes after SMILE using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 for myopia: a retrospective matched case–control study

“…Analyzing the topographic shape of the cornea and adjusting the preoperative astigmatism are very important in SMILE to obtain good clinical results 25 . However, these processes can be disrupted by an asymmetric corneal surface or dry eye conditions 26 . Centration and axis parameters, which previously depended on the operator’s manual adjustment and experience with the VISUMAX 500, can now be quantitatively adjusted based on ocular measurements such as corneal topography in the VISUMAX 800.…”

“…Operators must rely on tear film marks for centration using VISUMAX 500, which are difficult to trust because of factors such as dryness and corneal shape 32 . The irregular or asymmetric shape of the corneal surface in VISUMAX 500 can cause decentration, leading to a larger induction of HOAs 26 . Occasionally, unsatisfactory postoperative visual acuity results in SMILE may result from this issue 33 .…”