2021
DOI: 10.3390/vibration4010014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Reduction Methods for Finite Element Geometrically Nonlinear Beam Structures

Abstract: The aim of this contribution is to present numerical comparisons of model-order reduction methods for geometrically nonlinear structures in the general framework of finite element (FE) procedures. Three different methods are compared: the implicit condensation and expansion (ICE), the quadratic manifold computed from modal derivatives (MD), and the direct normal form (DNF) procedure, the latter expressing the reduced dynamics in an invariant-based span of the phase space. The methods are first presented in ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the method does not rely on the slow-fast assumption between master and slave modes, since the velocity is directly accounted by the parametrisation procedure. This is a major achievement since it offers a uniformly valid and simulation-free method that could be blindly applied to any structure without the need of extra assumptions [48][49][50][51], for the same computational cost of other methods. Normal form theory makes the distinction between resonant and nonresonant couplings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the method does not rely on the slow-fast assumption between master and slave modes, since the velocity is directly accounted by the parametrisation procedure. This is a major achievement since it offers a uniformly valid and simulation-free method that could be blindly applied to any structure without the need of extra assumptions [48][49][50][51], for the same computational cost of other methods. Normal form theory makes the distinction between resonant and nonresonant couplings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICE and MD assume the manifold to be velocity independent, assumption which is the more fulfilled, the larger the slow/fast separation between the slave and master coordinates [47][48][49]. In [48], it is estimated that a ratio between eigenfrequencies of the slave modes and those of the master modes of at least three ensures the correctness of MDs in the prediction of the hardening/softening behaviour [49][50][51]. The inclusion of velocity dependence in the MD approach have been proposed in [52] to overcome this limitation, and leads to similar formulations than those reported in [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3, FOM and ROM backbones start departing for normalized amplitudes greater than 0.8, ultimately leading to a 1Hz difference at an amplitude of 1.2.) Interestingly, the aforementioned empiric rules used to select VMs find theoretical confirmation in [17,60], where it is argued that a slow-fast decomposition assumption has to be made for the MD-based quadratic manifold approach to work, indicating a threshold ratio of 4 between the linear eigenfrequencies (i.e., ω p /ω s ≥ 4, p = s). However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no guarantee that this limit remains valid also in the MD-based linear manifold approach used in this work (i.e., where MDs are appended to the RB and additional independent reduced coordinates are introduced).…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the authors used the high-performance reduced FE square method to overcome the huge computational effort and evaluated their work in [ 19 ] for an industrial multiscale model. Many research works utilize the reduced-order model (ROM) technique to enhance the computational costs in different FE applications, some of which can be found in the literature [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%