Comparison of Recurrence and Complication Rates Following Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair among Preterm versus Full-Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LHR) in children has been widely performed in the last decades, although it is still not sufficiently researched in preterm infants. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the recurrence and complication rates following laparoscopic hernia repair among preterm (PT) versus full-term (FT) newborns. Methods: Scientific databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases) were systematically searched for relevant articles. The following terms were used: (laparoscopic hernia repair) AND (preterm). The inclusion criteria were all preterm newborns with a unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia who underwent LHR. The main outcomes were the incidence of recurrence of hernia and the proportion of children developing postoperative complications in comparison with FT newborns following LHR. Results: The present meta-analysis included four comparative studies. Three studies had a retrospective study design while one was a prospective study. A total of 1702 children were included (PT n = 523, FT n = 1179). The incidence of hernia recurrence showed no significant difference between the PT versus FT groups (RR = 2.58, 95% CI 0.89–7.47, p = 0.08). A significantly higher incidence of complications was observed in the PT group compared to the FT group (RR = 4.05, 95% CI 2.11–7.77, p < 0.0001). The PT group of newborns accounted for 81% and 72% of the major and minor complications. The major complications were either non-surgical (i.e., severe respiratory distress requiring reintubation with prolonged ventilation (or high-frequency ventilation), seizures, bradycardia), or surgical (i.e., hydroceles requiring operative intervention and umbilical port-site hernia). Conclusions: LHR in PT infants is associated with similar recurrence rates as in FT infants. However, the incidence of complications is significantly higher in PT versus FT infants.

The Incidence and Causes of Unplanned Reoperations as a Quality Indicator in Pediatric Surgery

“…Most used quality indicators in pediatric surgery are mortality, morbidity, unplanned readmissions, and the incidence of postoperative complications [ 3 , 4 ]. Many of those, such as mortality and morbidity, are often not applicable to the pediatric population because the incidence of those events is too low in children [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes Can Be Considered Safe in Children: A Single-Center 11-Year Retrospective Analysis

“…A minimally invasive laparoscopic approach has been well described as safe and effective method in many different conditions in children [28][29][30][31][32]. Several studies showed that percutaneous gastrostomy placement has more common major complications than the laparoscopic method [33,34].…”

Advances and Future Challenges of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children

“…Minimally invasive surgery has become very popular over the last 30 years. Minimally invasive surgery in the pediatric population was slow to advance, but due to the development of technologies and instruments adapted to newborns and small children over the last 20 years has rapidly expanded to include all major pediatric surgical procedures in infants and children [ 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. The benefits to the patient are great, but the technical hurdles are many, because of the varied size and physiology of this patient population.…”

“…Equipment and instruments used for minimally invasive procedures in the pediatric population are specially designed to allow safe access to the small abdominal or thoracic cavities, maintain an adequate working space and perform maneuvers with the same or even better safety and efficacy as in open procedures [ 4 , 7 , 8 , 10 ]. The diameter of instruments and telescopes varies from 2 to 10 mm depending on the procedure and child’s age [ 3 , 4 , 7 , 10 ].…”

“…A single incision laparoscopic surgery has for many pediatric surgeons become the treatment of choice in many different pediatric minimally invasive procedures. Conversion to classical three port laparoscopic or thoracic surgery can be easily performed when procedures were started through a single incision [ 8 ]. With the availability of robotic surgery in the early 2000s, some pediatric centers established robotic pediatric surgery programs.…”