2021
DOI: 10.11623/frj.2021.29.2.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Recognition of Korean Domestic and International Floral Design Certificates Based on Certificate Acquisition Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, the participants tended to show a higher level of trust in an instructor’s teaching skills when the instructor held the Korea Professional Golfers’ Association certification ( Kim, 2011 ; Joo, 2020 ), who compared the perception of domestic and international floral design certifications, verified the difference in the level of trust and preference depending on certification acquisition by identifying learners’ increased preference for and trust in international certifications compared to domestic certifications. These results indicate that perceiving expertise differently depending on certification levels affects lesson participation intention as well as instructor credibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In previous studies, the participants tended to show a higher level of trust in an instructor’s teaching skills when the instructor held the Korea Professional Golfers’ Association certification ( Kim, 2011 ; Joo, 2020 ), who compared the perception of domestic and international floral design certifications, verified the difference in the level of trust and preference depending on certification acquisition by identifying learners’ increased preference for and trust in international certifications compared to domestic certifications. These results indicate that perceiving expertise differently depending on certification levels affects lesson participation intention as well as instructor credibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%