2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Moreover, volumetric measurements of LV mass were found to correlate highly with CMR reference values in patients with wall motion abnormalities 8 and in patients with abnormally shaped ventricles secondary to congenital heart disease. 24 Although the former study described a considerable negative bias, the latter reported only minimal biases. Similar to the inconsistencies with LV volume measurements, these differences are likely to be due to differences in strategies for identifying and tracing the endocardial and epicardial boundaries.…”
Section: Rt3de Evaluation Of LV Massmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…23 Moreover, volumetric measurements of LV mass were found to correlate highly with CMR reference values in patients with wall motion abnormalities 8 and in patients with abnormally shaped ventricles secondary to congenital heart disease. 24 Although the former study described a considerable negative bias, the latter reported only minimal biases. Similar to the inconsistencies with LV volume measurements, these differences are likely to be due to differences in strategies for identifying and tracing the endocardial and epicardial boundaries.…”
Section: Rt3de Evaluation Of LV Massmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the availability of more accurate, but complex, biplanar and three-dimensional echocardiographic methods to measure heart function (1,4), basic M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography (2D-echo) are the most commonly used techniques (2,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). The major limitations of 2D-echo are the small acoustic window through which the acquisitions can be made (14), the need for a skilled operator (15), and assumptions that are made about left ventricular geometry (16,17), which become problematic in the asymmetrical left ventricle after myocardial infarction (1,14,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, there were significant differences between LVRI detected by RT3DE and 2DE in HHD and CAD groups, and had significant different correlations. Therefore, we could concluded that LVRI detected by RT3DE was superior to LVRI detected by 2DE according to the principles of RT3DE and 2DE, previous studies [5,6,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] , and this study combined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Previous studies showed that conventional transthoracic 2DE was not ideal for accurate quantification of left ventricular volume for its subject to image-plane positioning errors, or left ventricular was distorted in shape after acute myocardial infarction, or left ventricle developed aneurysm in myocardial infarction [13][14][15][16] . On the contrary, for recent advances in capability of new combination of ultrasound system, computer processing and commercial software, RT3DE has resolved many of the limitations associated with the evaluation of left ventricular volume from 2DE images and significantly improved the accuracy of these measurements [17] , and provided fast, accurate and available assessment of left ventricular volume, left ventricular mass without geometric assumptions, which resulted in higher levels of agreement and reproducibility with the CMR reference values [5,6,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] . Moreover, left ventricular cavity remodeled often developed dilation, distortion, or regional abnormal wall motion, even developed many abnormal changes in one cardiac cycle [25] , which caused left ventricular morphology departure from geometric assumption model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%