2017
DOI: 10.3390/s18010018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel-2 Imagery

Abstract: In previous classification studies, three non-parametric classifiers, Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), were reported as the foremost classifiers at producing high accuracies. However, only a few studies have compared the performances of these classifiers with different training sample sizes for the same remote sensing images, particularly the Sentinel-2 Multispectral Imager (MSI). In this study, we examined and compared the performances of the RF, kNN, and SVM cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
303
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 836 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
13
303
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although figures are used as class tags, there is no other relationship between any two classes. There are many commonly used methods to solve classification problems [33], including SVM [34], decision tree classifier [35], nearest neighbor algorithm [36], and CNN-based classification algorithms. The accuracy rate is the most commonly used index to describe the classification quality.…”
Section: Ordinal Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although figures are used as class tags, there is no other relationship between any two classes. There are many commonly used methods to solve classification problems [33], including SVM [34], decision tree classifier [35], nearest neighbor algorithm [36], and CNN-based classification algorithms. The accuracy rate is the most commonly used index to describe the classification quality.…”
Section: Ordinal Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning techniques, Random Forest (RF) [82][83][84][85] and Naïve Bayes were further utilized to classify and provide greater clarity to the feature distribution. The RF technique, which was found to yield the clearest results, is a nonparametric method for modelling the continuous and discrete data of decision tree methods and is a well-established and reliable process [86][87][88]. However, quantitative characterization of the inputs passed to the model must be rigidly applied, and factors such as the uncertainty of the data taken into account in order to prevent overfitting and incorrect outcomes [89][90][91].…”
Section: Advanced Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They generally occur when the training data are not evenly distributed across all classes and concentrated on a certain few classes. If such issues exist, the overall accuracy for the model performance might be diminished because rare classes are not adequately trained [69,70]. The class imbalance issue is common in many real-world applications [71], including ocean color data.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%