2021 International Mobile, Intelligent, and Ubiquitous Computing Conference (MIUCC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/miucc52538.2021.9447676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting Fingerprints to Enhance an indoor Wifi Localization System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has also been published by Bentéjac et al 45 who compared XGBoost to several gradient-boosting algorithms. The XGBoost Algorithm was also shown to achieve a lower error value in comparison to random forests by Niang et al 46 . XGBoost is a more regularized form of Gradient Boosting.…”
Section: /15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has also been published by Bentéjac et al 45 who compared XGBoost to several gradient-boosting algorithms. The XGBoost Algorithm was also shown to achieve a lower error value in comparison to random forests by Niang et al 46 . XGBoost is a more regularized form of Gradient Boosting.…”
Section: /15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with regular bagging approaches with no self-pruning, such as the RF model, RF trees are fully grown to classify a possible category, where variance is reduced to achieve mitigated errors in predictions. In contrast, the XGB uses weak learners that are defined by high bias and low variance (Niang et al, 2021). Hence, the XGB can potentially help with learning better from an imbalanced distribution of input classes.…”
Section: Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgb)mentioning
confidence: 99%