2024
DOI: 10.3390/rs16040665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Random Forest and XGBoost Classifiers Using Integrated Optical and SAR Features for Mapping Urban Impervious Surface

Zhenfeng Shao,
Muhammad Nasar Ahmad,
Akib Javed

Abstract: The integration of optical and SAR datasets through ensemble machine learning models shows promising results in urban remote sensing applications. The integration of multi-sensor datasets enhances the accuracy of information extraction. This research presents a comparison of two ensemble machine learning classifiers (random forest and extreme gradient boost (XGBoost)) classifiers using an integration of optical and SAR features and simple layer stacking (SLS) techniques. Therefore, Sentinel-1 (SAR) and Landsat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies have been conducted using support vector machines [37] and random forest [38] for land use/cover classification. Although SVM and RF are superior in many ways, XGBoost performs better on many datasets, handles category imbalances better, and is able to achieve higher accuracy [39][40][41]. In this study, RF and SVM methods were used for a comparative analysis using the same input features as XGBoost.…”
Section: Land Use Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have been conducted using support vector machines [37] and random forest [38] for land use/cover classification. Although SVM and RF are superior in many ways, XGBoost performs better on many datasets, handles category imbalances better, and is able to achieve higher accuracy [39][40][41]. In this study, RF and SVM methods were used for a comparative analysis using the same input features as XGBoost.…”
Section: Land Use Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XGBoost is widely used as a classification model in urban geography research [41]. In this paper, NTL images, DEM images, and water area images were used as inputs to the model, and the model classified each pixel as a built-up or non-built-up area to obtain the prediction result.…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These datasets were integrated to effectively delineate urban impervious surfaces, overcoming challenges associated with land use classes, building shadows, and cloud cover. As a result, the accuracy of UIS (urban impervious surface) mapping was significantly improved [16,22]. Additionally, the incorporation of indexes and textures enhanced the ability to identify urbanization patterns and accurately map impervious surface areas.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%