2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.04.20226159
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Radiomic Feature Aggregation Methods for Patients with Multiple Tumors

Abstract: Background: Radiomic feature analysis has been shown to be effective at modeling cancer outcomes. It has not yet been established how to best combine these radiomic features in patients with multifocal disease. As the number of patients with multifocal metastatic cancer continues to rise, there is a need for improving personalized patient-level prognostication to better inform treatment. Methods: We compared six mathematical methods of combining radiomic features of 3596 tumors in 831 patients with multiple b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MRI images were obtained from a MRI dataset of 831 patients with 3,596 brain metastases treated with primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) at our institution between 2000-2018 [29]. Patients with prior resection or prior radiation treatment were excluded along with metastases <5 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MRI images were obtained from a MRI dataset of 831 patients with 3,596 brain metastases treated with primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) at our institution between 2000-2018 [29]. Patients with prior resection or prior radiation treatment were excluded along with metastases <5 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI data consisted of brain MRIs from 831 patients from a single institution brain metastases registry (22). The presence or absence of a malignancy was identified on 4,000 brain lesions seen on MRI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation