2018
DOI: 10.5194/asr-15-81-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of radiation parametrizations within the HARMONIE–AROME NWP model

Abstract: Abstract. Downwelling shortwave radiation at the surface (SWDS, global solar radiation flux), given by three different parametrization schemes, was compared to observations in the HARMONIE-AROME numerical weather prediction (NWP) model experiments over Finland in spring 2017. Simulated fluxes agreed well with each other and with the observations in the clear-sky cases. In the cloudy-sky conditions, all schemes tended to underestimate SWDS at the daily level, as compared to the measurements. Large local and tem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed climatologies can be obtained from surface-based instrumentation (Ohmura et al, 1998) and from satellite (Posselt et al, 2012;López and Batlles, 2014;Müller et al, 2015). Climatologies can also be derived from Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) forecasts and reanalyses, which are attractive from a cost perspective but may display larger uncertainties than observations (Jia et al, 2013;Boilley and Wald, 2015;Frank et al, 2018;Urraca et al, 2018). Climatologies require that the correct amount and type of cloud is predicted on average, whereas a forecast additionally requires that the cloud is forecast at the right time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observed climatologies can be obtained from surface-based instrumentation (Ohmura et al, 1998) and from satellite (Posselt et al, 2012;López and Batlles, 2014;Müller et al, 2015). Climatologies can also be derived from Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) forecasts and reanalyses, which are attractive from a cost perspective but may display larger uncertainties than observations (Jia et al, 2013;Boilley and Wald, 2015;Frank et al, 2018;Urraca et al, 2018). Climatologies require that the correct amount and type of cloud is predicted on average, whereas a forecast additionally requires that the cloud is forecast at the right time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to them, the solar radiation data has a higher spatial and temporal resolution. A previous study, for example, compared the performance of different radiation schemes in the HARMONIE-AROME NWP model with solar radiation measurements during spring in Finland (Rontu and Lindfors, 2018). They found good agreement between the model and measurements in clear-sky cases, while under cloudy skies, the modeled surface solar radiation tended to be too high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observed cloud cover greater than 0.9 shows a positive solar radiation forecast ME (27 W m −2 ) and observed cloud cover less than 0.1 shows negative ME (−16 W m −2 ). This negative bias during clear-sky situations over Helsinki was also observed by Rontu and Lindfors (2018) and is most likely due to the aerosol climatology implemented in the model having too much aerosol. Another possible source of negative bias during clear-sky situations would be too much water vapour in the atmosphere.…”
Section: How Do Errors In Cloud Cover Impact the Solar Radiation Foresupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Eddy-Covariance technique, used in paper III to investigate the effect of LLJs on the fluxes of latent and sensible heat and the net ecosystem CO 2 exchange, requires a sonic anemometer in addition to an open path gas-analyser (Mauder et al, 2013). Pyranometers were used in paper IV to observe the GHI, and 1-minute averaged, quality-controlled GHI values (Long and Shi, 2008;Rontu and Lindfors, 2018) over four years were used.…”
Section: Other Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation