2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Radiation Doses From Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography and Conventional Diagnostic Angiography

Abstract: The mean effective dose for MSCT coronary angiography was significantly higher than that for conventional angiography. As MSCT cardiac scanners become increasingly available, operators must be aware of the radiation dose and the factors that affect it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
121
7
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
5
121
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this, Figure 1 demonstrates a marked variability between patients in the doses to individual organs. Es here were lower than those in another recent report using 16-slice CTCA by Cole et al 6 , despite the fact that the two studies employed similar tube current, tube voltage, and pitch. A notable difference between the two studies was the employment of ECTCM in 66% of patients in this study.…”
Section: Radiation Dose In Ctcacontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Consistent with this, Figure 1 demonstrates a marked variability between patients in the doses to individual organs. Es here were lower than those in another recent report using 16-slice CTCA by Cole et al 6 , despite the fact that the two studies employed similar tube current, tube voltage, and pitch. A notable difference between the two studies was the employment of ECTCM in 66% of patients in this study.…”
Section: Radiation Dose In Ctcacontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…19 The effective dose for diagnostic cardiac catheterization was set at 7mSv for the base analysis, but was varied down to 5mSv for the sensitivity analysis. 20,21 Imaging/testing costs were computed as a combination of professional and technical fees as reported in table 3. For the purpose of cost comparisons, we refer to these costs as imaging costs even though the stress ECG study does not include …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, most studies have yielded effective radiation dose values of 6 mSv to 16 mSv for 16-slice scanners and 11 mSv to 21 mSv for 64-slice scanners, compared with approximately 6 mSv for CCA (75)(76)(77). In practical terms, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements identifies a risk factor for lifetime cancer mortality of 5×10 -2 per 1 Sv exposure, which, given the above data, translates into a risk of inducing a fatal cancer of 0.05% to 0.11% for each 64-slice MDCT and 0.03% for each CCA (1).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%