Comparison of Quick-Set and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Root-end Fillings for the Regeneration of Apical Tissues in Dogs

Kohout, George D.; He, Jianing; Primus, Carolyn M.; Opperman, Lynne A.; Woodmansey, Karl F.

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.005

Cited by 23 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…, Kohout et al . ); however, Quick‐Set was associated with significantly more inflammation compared to tooth‐coloured ProRoot MTA (Kohout et al . ).…”

Section: Bioactive Endodontic Cements As Root‐end Filling Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is a dental material used extensively for vital pulp therapies (VPT), protecting scaffolds during regenerative endodontic procedures, apical barriers in teeth with necrotic pulps and open apices, perforation repairs as well as root canal filling and root-end filling during surgical endodontics. A number of bioactive endodontic cements (BECs) have recently been introduced to the market. Most of these materials have calcium and silicate in their compositions; however, bioactivity is a common property of these cements. These materials include the following: BioAggregate, Biodentine, BioRoot RCS, calciumenriched mixture cement, Endo-CPM, Endocem, EndoSequence, EndoBinder, EndoSeal MTA, iRoot, MicroMega MTA, MTA Bio, MTA Fillapex, MTA Plus, Neo MTA Plus, Ortho MTA, Quick-Set, Retro MTA, Tech Biosealer, and TheraCal LC. It has been claimed that these materials have properties similar to those of MTA but without the drawbacks. In Part I of this review, the available information on the chemical composition of the materials listed above was reviewed and their applications for VPT was discussed. In this article, the clinical applications of MTA and other BECs will be reviewed for apexification, regenerative endodontics, perforation repair, root canal filling, root-end filling, restorative procedures, periodontal defects and treatment of vertical and horizontal root fractures. In addition, the literature regarding the possible drawbacks of these materials following their clinical applications is reviewed. These drawbacks include their discolouration potential, systemic effects and retreatability following use as a root filling material. Based on selected keywords, all publications were searched regarding the use of MTA as well as BECs for the relevant clinical applications. Numerous publications were found regarding the use of BECs for various endodontic applications. The majority of these investigations compared BECs with MTA. Despite promising results for some materials, the number of publications using BECs for various clinical applications was limited. Furthermore, most studies had several methodological shortcomings and low levels of evidence.

show abstract

“…, Kohout et al . ); however, Quick‐Set was associated with significantly more inflammation compared to tooth‐coloured ProRoot MTA (Kohout et al . ).…”

Section: Bioactive Endodontic Cements As Root‐end Filling Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…, Kohout et al . ). Due to its biocompatibility and because it provides favourable conditions for repair, it has been used as an apical plug in teeth with incomplete root formation and in the treatment of perforations and as a root‐end filling material during apical surgery (Reyes‐Carmona et al .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Effects of the addition of nanoparticulate calcium carbonate on setting time, dimensional change, compressive strength, solubility and pH of MTA

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kohout et al (14) found that QS and WMTA had a similar effect on healing of apical tissues after root end surgery in dogs. Kramer et al (15) showed no difference in pain responses between QS and WMTA in pulp caps of rat molars.…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

Histologic Assessment of Quick-Set and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Pulpotomies in a Canine Model

Woodmansey

Kohout

Primus

et al. 2015

Journal of Endodontics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Quick-Set and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Root-end Fillings for the Regeneration of Apical Tissues in Dogs

Cited by 23 publications

References 25 publications

Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications

Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications

Effects of the addition of nanoparticulate calcium carbonate on setting time, dimensional change, compressive strength, solubility and pH of MTA

Histologic Assessment of Quick-Set and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Pulpotomies in a Canine Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About