2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.05.866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube to Tuberculin Skin Test for the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis (TB) in India - Preliminary Analysis

Abstract: In this study, PCR-RFLP analysis (PRA) of the gene encoding 65-kD heat shock protein (hsp65) was used for identification of 70 clinical NTM isolates obtained from two mycobacteriology laboratories in Malaysia. Approximately one third of the isolates were identified as M. fortuitum. A total of 24.3% and 10% of the isolates were identified as M. abscessus and M. avium complex respectively. Other isolates identified were M. kansasii, M. marinum, M. simiae, M. parascrofulaceum, M. szulgai, and M. gordonae. Six cli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the manufacturer recommended cut-off value; we found sensitivity of 64.5% and specificity of 36.8% of the test. The sensitivity of the test observed in the present study is much lower than sensitivity reported from TB endemic areas using the same test [9,29]. The discrepancy between the present study and these previous studies could be explained by multiple factors like population background and immune status, the clinical (disease) status and the socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants [14,19,20,30].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Using the manufacturer recommended cut-off value; we found sensitivity of 64.5% and specificity of 36.8% of the test. The sensitivity of the test observed in the present study is much lower than sensitivity reported from TB endemic areas using the same test [9,29]. The discrepancy between the present study and these previous studies could be explained by multiple factors like population background and immune status, the clinical (disease) status and the socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants [14,19,20,30].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The sensitivity of QFT-GIT (84.8%) in our study was higher than the reported range in the earlier studies from highly endemic countries, Xia et al . (80.9%) in China 8 , 81% in India 24 , and 64.0% in Gambia 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%