Comparison of quality/quantity mNGS and usual mNGS for pathogen detection in suspected pulmonary infections

Abstract

Improved metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), for example, quality/quantity mNGS (QmNGS), is being used in the diagnosis of pulmonary pathogens. There are differences between QmNGS and the usual mNGS (UmNGS), but reports that compare their detection performances are rare. In this prospective study of patients enrolled between December 2021 and March 2022, the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of thirty-six patients with suspected pulmonary infection was assessed using UmNGS and QmNGS. The sensitivity of QmNGS was similar to that of UmNGS. The specificity of QmNGS was higher than that of UmNGS; however, the difference was not statistically significant. The positive likelihood ratios (+LR) of QmNGS and UmNGS were 3.956 and 1.394, respectively, and the negative likelihood ratios (-LR) were 0.342 and 0.527, respectively. For the co-detection of pathogens, the depth and coverage of the QmNGS sequencing were lower than those of UmNGS, while for the detection of pathogens isolated from patients with pulmonary infection, the concordance rate was 77.2%. In the eleven patients with nonpulmonary infection, only viruses were detected using QmNGS, while UmNGS detected not only viruses but also bacteria and fungi. This study provides a basis for the selection of mNGS for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary infection.

Present and Future Applications of Digital PCR in Infectious Diseases Diagnosis

“…However, a recent study on different clinical sample types, using dPCR, next generation sequencing (NGS) and conventional commercial qPCR simultaneously, showed that the most sensitive method was dPCR (99%), over NGS (86%) and conventional qPCR (64%) [38].…”