Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002.
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2002.1190878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of PV module performance before and after 11-years of field exposure

Abstract: In 1990 the Schatz Energy Research Center (SERC) installed a PV array comprised of 192 ARCO M-75 modules. Prior to installation, Zoellick [1] carefully measured module performance and reported average peak power at normal operating cell temperature (NOCT) to be 39.88 W, which was 14.1% lower than the 46.4 W nameplate rating. For the past 11 years the array has been exposed to and employed in a cool, marine environment. Of the original 192 modules, 191 were recently tested in order to re-evaluate their performa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
1
1

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is very comparable to the data observed in this study. The degradation rate for a further PV array 6 installed in 1991 indicates a degradation of 4Á39% in 11 years, again comparable to this study. The causes for degradation in continuous operation can be many.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is very comparable to the data observed in this study. The degradation rate for a further PV array 6 installed in 1991 indicates a degradation of 4Á39% in 11 years, again comparable to this study. The causes for degradation in continuous operation can be many.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The main conclusion of these studies is that solar modules do not usually fail in a catastrophic way but experience a steady power degradation over time. 5,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] This degradation process has been reported to undergo two different stages: within the first year of exposure solar modules exhibit a rapid degradation (1-3%), 18,19,27 thereafter a slower linear degradation rate is observed (0Á5-1Á0%/year). Another important issue that affects PV module performance is that the variability of PV module power increases over time.…”
Section: Review Of Field Degradation Studies Of Pv Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important issue that affects PV module performance is that the variability of PV module power increases over time. 18,20,21 In the following we will summarize the most significant data from the degradation studies in Table I: 1. The Australian Cooperative Research Center 15 evaluated the performance of five different PV module technologies-c-Si, p-Si, triple junction a-Si, CIS and the laser grooved buried contact (LGBC) c-Si-over 16 months of operation in a temperate climate (Perth, Australia).…”
Section: Review Of Field Degradation Studies Of Pv Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, manufacturers often consider this initial decrease in power to be part of the assumed degradation of longterm sunlight exposure. There are many studies on longterm degradation [11][12][13]. Some of them present models to predict the future power that PV modules will supply [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%