2021
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of pulse‐dose and high‐dose corticosteroids with no corticosteroid treatment for COVID‐19 pneumonia in the intensive care unit

Abstract: Corticosteroid dosing in the range of 0.5–2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone equivalents has become a standard part of the management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia based on positive results of randomized trials and a meta‐analysis. Alongside such conventional dosing, administration of 1 gm of methylprednisolone daily (pulse dosing) has also been reported in the literature with claims of favorable outcomes. Comparisons between such disparate approaches to corticosteroids for Coron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, we excluded 1558 studies because of the following: 1391 studies used inappropriate doses of steroids or lacked the appropriate comparison, 128 studies did not report data regarding the interventions of interest, and 39 studies were excluded due to lack of the appropriate outcomes of interest. Eventually, 10 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis 14–19,22–25 . Figure 1 shows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) flow chart that illustrates how the final studies were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, we excluded 1558 studies because of the following: 1391 studies used inappropriate doses of steroids or lacked the appropriate comparison, 128 studies did not report data regarding the interventions of interest, and 39 studies were excluded due to lack of the appropriate outcomes of interest. Eventually, 10 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis 14–19,22–25 . Figure 1 shows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) flow chart that illustrates how the final studies were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, 10 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 Figure 1 shows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) flow chart that illustrates how the final studies were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Contudo, nenhum conseguiu demonstrar diminuição da mortalidade em comparação com o esquema de dexametasona recomendado. Em setembro de 2021, Yakoob et al 16 comparou retrospetivamente esquemas de 1 -2 mg/kg/dia de metilprednisolona versus esquemas com 1000 mg/dia versus 0 mg de corticóide, onde foram verificados melhores outcomes nos doentes tratados com doses de 1 -2 mg/kg/dia que nos doentes tratados com doses mais elevadas, onde se verificaram mais complicações associadas ao tratamento. O mesmo se verificou nos restantes estudos com doses superiores a 250 mg/dia de metilprednisolona -sem benefício adicional pelo aumento marcado de complicações.…”
Section: Tratamento Dirigido à Covid-19unclassified