2019
DOI: 10.7736/kspe.2019.36.8.737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of PSD Analysis Methods in Frequency Domain Fatigue Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Lalanne approach, the probability density function (PDF) of peaks is assumed to be the simple sum of Gaussian and Rayleigh distributions [ 58 ], while the Dirlik approach assumes the PDF of peaks is a combination two Rayleigh densities and an exponential. Due to this assumption, the cycle counting distribution in the Dirlik approach decays faster compared to that of the Lalanne method, as shown in Figure 16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Lalanne approach, the probability density function (PDF) of peaks is assumed to be the simple sum of Gaussian and Rayleigh distributions [ 58 ], while the Dirlik approach assumes the PDF of peaks is a combination two Rayleigh densities and an exponential. Due to this assumption, the cycle counting distribution in the Dirlik approach decays faster compared to that of the Lalanne method, as shown in Figure 16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cycle counting results using the Lalanne, Dirlik, and narrow-band approaches for the measured responses are illustrated in Figures 15-17, respectively, while a summary of the results is presented in Table 6. In the Lalanne approach, the probability density function (PDF) of peaks is assumed to be the simple sum of Gaussian and Rayleigh distributions [58], while the Dirlik approach assumes the PDF of peaks is a combination two Rayleigh densities and an exponential. Due to this assumption, the cycle counting distribution in the Dirlik approach decays faster compared to that of the Lalanne method, as shown in Figure 16.…”
Section: Forced Vibration Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%