1970
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.25.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Proton Momentum Spectra in Proton-Proton Collisions Involving Pion and Kaon Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From experimental data on the high-energy inclusive pp reactions, it is known that the distribution of x is approximately independent of √ s (called "Feynman scaling" [93,94]). Indeed, various experiments reported that the kinetic energy of the final-state proton K ′ i in the inclusive pion production process has flat distribution (see, for e.g., [95]). Thus, with such experimental result, we estimate the averaged value of x as…”
Section: C21 Inelastic Scattering With Background Protonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From experimental data on the high-energy inclusive pp reactions, it is known that the distribution of x is approximately independent of √ s (called "Feynman scaling" [93,94]). Indeed, various experiments reported that the kinetic energy of the final-state proton K ′ i in the inclusive pion production process has flat distribution (see, for e.g., [95]). Thus, with such experimental result, we estimate the averaged value of x as…”
Section: C21 Inelastic Scattering With Background Protonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and similarly for the target contribution. It has long been known that, to good approximation, the distribution of outgoing nucleons in a high energy nucleon-nucleon collision is flat in longitudinal momentum or a hyperbolic cosine (symmetric about the CM) in rapidity [11,12]. This knowledge does not uniquely determine the 2-particle kernel K but with the additional, sensible, requirements that the projectile distribution be forward peaked and that the simplest mathematical representation be used consistent with the data, leads to the parametrization…”
Section: Formulation and Solution Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work [21] we have fixed N for the monopole related form factor (10) in the interval 1.2-1.3 GeV fitting the forward differential cross section of the reaction pp → da + 0 from [33]. On the other hand, the same data can be described rather well using a dipole form factor (at the vertices) with N = 1.55-1.6 GeV (cf figure 7).…”
Section: The Reaction Nn → Nnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This undesirable property is absent in the form factor (10), where we consider the cut-off N as a free parameter. In our previous work [21] we fixed N in the interval 1.2-1.3 GeV using experimental data on the differential cross section of the reaction pp → da + 0 at p lab = 3.8-6.3 GeV/c [33]; in this study we take N = 1.24 GeV as an average value (see also the discussion in section 4).…”
Section: An Effective Lagrangian Approach With One-pion Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation