2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of protective supports and antioxidative capacity of two bio-based films with revalorised fruit pomaces extracted from blueberry and red grape skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of both extracts did not significantly change the E of CS films, while this parameter was decreased for all CMC films. CS films with blueberry extract followed the same trend as reported in our previous study (Kurek et al., ), thus these results are not listed in the present study. According to Bonilla, Fortunati, Atarés, Chiralt, and Kenny (), decrease of storage modulus could be attributed to the lack of cohesion among polymeric chains, caused by the incorporation of natural antioxidants in CS and CMC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The addition of both extracts did not significantly change the E of CS films, while this parameter was decreased for all CMC films. CS films with blueberry extract followed the same trend as reported in our previous study (Kurek et al., ), thus these results are not listed in the present study. According to Bonilla, Fortunati, Atarés, Chiralt, and Kenny (), decrease of storage modulus could be attributed to the lack of cohesion among polymeric chains, caused by the incorporation of natural antioxidants in CS and CMC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…BP and RP were poured to CMC and CS solutions at total phenolic content (TPC) levels of 0.06, 0.13, and 0.25 w/v for BP, and 0.006, 0.012, and 0.02 w/v for RP‐based films that correspond to extract concentrations of 1%, 2%, and 4% w/v. TPC in extracts was reported in the previous study (Kurek et al., ). Blueberry extract had 63.1 mg g of extract −1 , while red grape skin pomace extract had 5.85 mg g of extract −1 .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Besides its use as a natural dyeing colorant for wood, silk, cotton, polyamide or acrylic fabrics [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins from red grape and other sources have been recently used as pH-sensitive compounds in intelligent packaging and as an active substance in active film-packaging formulation [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. For example, Kurek et al evaluated the antioxidant properties of chitosan and carboxymethyl cellulose films enriched with blueberry and red grape pomace extracts [ 16 ]. Bi et al completed a deep study and demonstrated not only the antioxidant properties but also the antimicrobial ones of a chitosan-proanthocyanidins film against Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes during in vitro experiments [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regard grape by-products, around 20% of whole grapes are generally rejected after the wine making process, even though these by-products are very rich in flavonoids and phenols (more that 70% are found in the skin) [ 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. Interesting results were found in the study of Kurek et al [ 50 ] who used two different bio-resources (red grape skin pomace and blueberry extracts) to develop a new active packaging with antioxidant properties. The extracts obtained by microwave-assisted extraction were incorporated into chitosan and carboxymethyl cellulose film, respectively.…”
Section: Fruit and Vegetable By-products To Enhance Antioxidant Prmentioning
confidence: 99%