2021
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of prospective and retrospective motion correction in 3D‐encoded neuroanatomical MRI

Abstract: Purpose: To compare prospective motion correction (PMC) and retrospective motion correction (RMC) in Cartesian 3D-encoded MPRAGE scans and to investigate the effects of correction frequency and parallel imaging on the performance of RMC.Methods: Head motion was estimated using a markerless tracking system and sent to a modified MPRAGE sequence, which can continuously update the imaging FOV to perform PMC. The prospective correction was applied either before each echo train (before-ET) or at every sixth readout… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Artifacts primarily arise from Nyquist violations locally in k‐space, limited motion‐tracking frequency, uncompensated field fluctuations, and lack of sampling density compensation. For large sudden rotations, the lack of density compensation and undersampled regions of k‐space introduce ringing artifacts that counteract the benefits of correction, which is a limitation of the retrospective motion correction and reconstruction rather than the motion tracking itself 4,54 . These can be avoided when prospectively updating the scanner FOV and with reacquisition of corrupted k‐space lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Artifacts primarily arise from Nyquist violations locally in k‐space, limited motion‐tracking frequency, uncompensated field fluctuations, and lack of sampling density compensation. For large sudden rotations, the lack of density compensation and undersampled regions of k‐space introduce ringing artifacts that counteract the benefits of correction, which is a limitation of the retrospective motion correction and reconstruction rather than the motion tracking itself 4,54 . These can be avoided when prospectively updating the scanner FOV and with reacquisition of corrupted k‐space lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be avoided when prospectively updating the scanner FOV and with reacquisition of corrupted k‐space lines. Simulation of the best attainable retrospective correction using the measured motion to corrupt images in silico followed by correction could serve as a comparison to “best‐case correction” but was beyond the scope of the study 54 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experiment was conducted on the first subject on both a 3 T and 7 T scanner. Additional sequence parameters were at 3 T, 1.50 × 1.741.74 mm 3 For each scan session on both scanners, coil array sensitivity profiles used in the reconstructions were estimated from a separate low-resolution (6 × 6 × 6 mm 3 ) reference scan using a custom implementation of the ESPIRiT algorithm. 33…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospective techniques have shown to be advantageous in terms of spin history and k-space sampling density, but the need for extra hardware limits these methods in clinical workflow. 3 Retrospective methods, on the other hand, can be applied to a variety of sequences and do not require any type of additional hardware. The aligned sensitivity encoding (SENSE) framework 4 achieves intrascan motion estimation and correction for volumetric anatomical imaging by temporally subdividing k-space samples and accounting for different motion states in each segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation