Comparison of primary stability in craniofacial implant with V-shape and buttress thread design in goat skull using resonance frequency analysis

Ramkumar, K; Sripriya, S; Meenakshi, A.; Sabarigirinathan, C.; Thulasingam, C

doi:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_447_17

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding the shape of the implant threads, studies have shown that different thread configurations present better results depending on the type of bone where the implants are installed 17 , 18 . Triangular or sharp threads reduce bone resistance during implant insertion by inducing cuts in the bone structure, which facilitate implant placement in high-density bone 19 , 20 . On the other hand, the condensing square threads compress the bony trabeculae and increase locking in bone with low density 17 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different thread configurations on hydrophilic implant stability. A split-mouth RCT

Barbosa,

Oliveira,

Goulart

et al. 2024

Braz. Dent. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This split-mouth randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the primary and secondary stability of hybrid implants with different thread configurations and hydrophilic surfaces. Twenty patients with a partially edentulous maxilla were selected. These patients received two types of implants with the same hydrophilic surface: CTP group: Cylindrical-Tapered implant with perforating threads; CTH: Cylindrical-Tapered implant with hybrid threads configuration (perforating and condensing threads). The primary and secondary stability parameters were measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis at the time of implant placement and 7, 28, 56, and 90 days after the surgical procedure. The paired t-test was used to compare the data on the implant's stability between the groups. The statistical analysis was performed with a confidence level set at 95%. It was found that the implants in the CTH group presented higher primary stability values at the time of implant placement, due to the higher ISQ (63.61 ± 9.44 vs. 40.59 ±7.46) and insertion torque (36.92 ± 16.50 Ncm vs. 28.00 ± 14.40 Ncm), than the implants in the CTP group. The CTH group presented higher ISQ values in all follow-up periods: 7 days (68.67 ± 7.60 vs. 41.55 ± 9.07), 28 days (68.61 ± 5.98 vs. 47.90 ±13.10), 56 days (74.09 ± 3.96 vs. 55.85 ± 13.18), and 90 days (75.45 ± 4.02 vs. 63.47 ± 6.92) after implant placement. Hybrid implants with perforating and condensing threads demonstrated greater stability than hybrid implants with only perforating threads.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different thread configurations on hydrophilic implant stability. A split-mouth RCT

Barbosa,

Oliveira,

Goulart

et al. 2024

Braz. Dent. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Implants with buttress threads are more resistant to extraction forces than V-threads. 53 Steigenga et al. reported that implants with a square thread design had significantly higher BIC and greater reverse torque compared to V-shaped and reverse buttress thread designs.…”

Section: Factors Affecting Primary Stabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Primary stability of implant placement and loading related to dental implant materials and designs: A literature review

Huang

Ding

2023

Journal of Dental Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of primary stability in craniofacial implant with V-shape and buttress thread design in goat skull using resonance frequency analysis

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Effect of different thread configurations on hydrophilic implant stability. A split-mouth RCT

Effect of different thread configurations on hydrophilic implant stability. A split-mouth RCT

Primary stability of implant placement and loading related to dental implant materials and designs: A literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About