1989
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198912000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of prehospital conventional and simultaneous compression-ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 3 additional studies (LOE 1 244 ; LOE 2 245 ; LOE 5 246 ) failed to consistently show improvement in survival to hospital discharge when compression-only CPR compared with conventional CPR was administered by professionals to adult patients with an OHCA.…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 3 additional studies (LOE 1 244 ; LOE 2 245 ; LOE 5 246 ) failed to consistently show improvement in survival to hospital discharge when compression-only CPR compared with conventional CPR was administered by professionals to adult patients with an OHCA.…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the outcome in clinical trials was disappointing [99]. One reason for this is that breath-stacking occurs when ventilation is as rapid as typical compression rates.…”
Section: Steady-state Effects Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the modified device (Life-Stat) capable of performing ventilation and chest compressions, there was no consistent haemodynamic benefit reported; a randomised trial showed no benefit compared with standard CPR, with survival superior in the conventional CPR group 24. This was largely thought to be secondary to a faster compression rate being required in the mechanical group or due to difficulties in deploying the device efficiently.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Mcpr Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%