2018
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Predictors and Mortality Between Bloodstream Infections Caused by ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli and ESBL-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Abstract: OBJECTIVETo compare the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and mortality of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) versus ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP) and to examine the differences in clinical characteristics and outcome between BSIs caused by isolates with CTX-M versus other ESBL genotypesMETHODSAs part of the INCREMENT project, 33 tertiary hospitals in 12 countries retrospectively collected data on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One may suggest that patients colonized with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae or Enterobacter spp. differ from those carrying ESBL-producing E. coli in terms of comorbidities and prior contacts with the healthcare system [12,13]. This could reflect more requirements for nursing care and invasive procedures, as well as more frequent antimicrobial exposure (that is, a more severe intestinal dysbiosis, with a higher faecal relative abundance of ESBL-E), resulting in an increase in the probability of cross-transmission events.…”
Section: Active Surveillance Cultures and Contact Precautions In The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may suggest that patients colonized with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae or Enterobacter spp. differ from those carrying ESBL-producing E. coli in terms of comorbidities and prior contacts with the healthcare system [12,13]. This could reflect more requirements for nursing care and invasive procedures, as well as more frequent antimicrobial exposure (that is, a more severe intestinal dysbiosis, with a higher faecal relative abundance of ESBL-E), resulting in an increase in the probability of cross-transmission events.…”
Section: Active Surveillance Cultures and Contact Precautions In The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High resistance such as was seen in the ESBL-KP and EBLS-EC BSIs in the present investigation indicates that there could be limited treatment options available to clinicians in healthcare settings [11]. Reports by the infectious Disease Society of America [25] listed ESBL-KP and ESBL-EC among the six MDR bacteria to which there is a need for urgent treatment options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Of utmost importance is to clearly characterize (a) the isolate with the in vitro susceptibilities, (b) the location of the infection, (c) the degree of source control of the infection, and finally (d) the clinical condition of the patient ( Table 1). In addition, recently published studies propose that all ESBL-PE do not belong in the same homogenous group as far as comorbidities, presentation, and outcome are concerned 6 . In particular, data have shown that bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with ESBL-producing E. coli were more frequently of a urinary source and community onset compared with BSIs with ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp.…”
Section: Before Starting Esbl Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, data have shown that bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with ESBL-producing E. coli were more frequently of a urinary source and community onset compared with BSIs with ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp. 6 .…”
Section: Before Starting Esbl Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%