2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Metabolic Rate in Healthy Nonobese and Obese Adults: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

27
534
2
37

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 615 publications
(609 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
27
534
2
37
Order By: Relevance
“…Many prediction equations are available for estimating metabolic rates, but their applicability to other ethnic groups is uncertain (Hayter and Henry 1993;Frankenfield et al, 2005). In the present study, FAO/WHO/UNU equations overestimated BMR by more than 0.45 MJ/day on average, with a prediction error comparable to previously published reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many prediction equations are available for estimating metabolic rates, but their applicability to other ethnic groups is uncertain (Hayter and Henry 1993;Frankenfield et al, 2005). In the present study, FAO/WHO/UNU equations overestimated BMR by more than 0.45 MJ/day on average, with a prediction error comparable to previously published reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Many equations have been developed to estimate BMR or SMR from body size measurements (Cunningham, 1991;Frankenfield et al, 2005), which can be helpful when actual metabolic measurements are not available. Their accuracy and applicability to specific ethnic groups must be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we thought the use of prediction equations for BMR would generate the present result. Many prediction equations are available for estimating BMR, but their applicability to other ethnic groups is uncertain (Hayter and Henry, 1993;Frankenfield et al, 2005). Ganpule et al (2007) suggested recently that the use of FAO/WHO/UNU equations overestimated BMR among Japanese when compared with measured BMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the agreement of equations based on sex, weight and age (Schofield, 1985;Henry, 2002) and height (Cole and Henry, 2002) with measured REE across different gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) groups was only moderate for men and poor for women (Ramirez-Zea, 2005). One explanation may be that body composition has not been taken into account in these as well as in most other REE prediction equations (for review see Frankenfield et al (2005)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%