2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of predicted fan broadband noise using a two- versus a three-dimensional synthetic turbulence method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ewert et al [39] applied this approach to study a variety of aeroacoustic problems, including trailing-edge noise, slat noise and jet noise. Kissner and Guérin [23] investigated fan broadband noise by coupling the RPM method with 3D PErturbed…”
Section: Random Particle Mesh Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ewert et al [39] applied this approach to study a variety of aeroacoustic problems, including trailing-edge noise, slat noise and jet noise. Kissner and Guérin [23] investigated fan broadband noise by coupling the RPM method with 3D PErturbed…”
Section: Random Particle Mesh Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency domain method has shown to be efficient in predicting the tonal noise and is also possible to be applied to analyse the broadband noise at discrete frequencies. The time domain method has the advantage that the continuous noise spectrum can be predicted within a single simulation, but tends to be more prone to numerical instability for 3D simulations [23,24].…”
Section: Lee/lns With Synthetic Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this study is to identify the most suitable technique for the estimation of turbulence parameters, namely, the turbulence integral length scale and the turbulence intensity (which can be understood as a normalized turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)). Commonly, methods for fan broadband noise prediction are based on analytic models [14][15][16][17], synthetic turbulence methods [18,19], and scale-resolving techniques [6,20,21]. They depend on turbulence parameters, which can include boundary layer thickness, turbulence integral length scale, and flow turbulence kinetic energy of the inlet flow or/and of the flow at the fan interstage section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation of a fully 3D turbulence structure represents still a challenging issue. Several methods have emerged to tackle this issue such as Synthetic Eddy Method (SEM) [6,7], extended to anisotropic flows and serrated airfoils [8,9], and Random Particle Mesh (RPM) methodology [10] with recent developments to generate 3D turbulence fields [11,12]. In this paper, the focus is put on the synthetic turbulence modeling with a particular interest on the development and implementation of a fully three-dimensional vector field (with the complete 3-wavenumbers spectrum and 3-velocity components).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%