2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-012-0350-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Preauricular Approach Versus Retromandibular Approach in Management of Condylar Fractures

Abstract: Both approaches have good results in managing condylar fractures with retromandibular approach having ease of access and ease of fixation. So one can always give preference to retromandibular approach over preauricular approach in managing the condylar fracture except in some cases where preauricular approach is the only option like anteromedial dislocation or complete medial dislocation of condylar segment. Situations, where patients who reported very late for the surgery with resultant scarring of the tissue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among modifications of this approach, Al-Kayat and Bramley (1979) modifications (13) have been very popular and are the most widely used at present. These modifications help to protect the facial nerve branches and provide good access to the condylar process, but the extremely limited area of ramal exposure makes the plate fixation technically difficult (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among modifications of this approach, Al-Kayat and Bramley (1979) modifications (13) have been very popular and are the most widely used at present. These modifications help to protect the facial nerve branches and provide good access to the condylar process, but the extremely limited area of ramal exposure makes the plate fixation technically difficult (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain good surgical visi-bility, the large distance between the incision line and the fixation level often requires heavy and continuous retraction of tissues, which can lead to facial nerve injury and tissue damage (13). The choice of the incision approach for the management of TMJ ankylosis is important to reduce post-operative complications (15). Therefore, the present study aimed to clinically compare between the conventional and modified preauricular incision approaches to the management of TMJ ankylosis among patients in Sana'a city -Yemen, regarding the accessibility, visibility, operation time, nerve complications, intra-and post-operative bleeding and aesthetic result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors introduce additional rules for the selection of appropriate surgical approach; e.g. the direction of the displacement of fractures, as mentioned by Mohan et al who use preauricular approach in patients with fractures with the medial displacement, while the retromandibular approach in patients with lateral displacement [73].…”
Section: The Choice Of Surgical Approach For the Open Treatment Of Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this early return to function, the chances for ankylosis is greatly reduced. Due to all these reasons and advantages there is an increase in the interest among majority of the surgeons to manage condylar fracture by ORIF [11].…”
Section: Post Operative Scarmentioning
confidence: 99%