2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping

Abstract: Background: There is an imperative need for SNP genotyping technologies that are cost-effective per sample with retained high accuracy, throughput and flexibility. We have developed a microarray-based technique and compared it to Pyrosequencing. In the protease-mediated allelespecific extension (PrASE), the protease constrains the elongation reaction and thus prevents incorrect nucleotide incorporation to mismatched 3'-termini primers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2005 ), for screening polymorphisms in a multiplex amplification of diagnostic SNP sites for 47 male dingoes, including two of the sequenced samples. The method has been shown to be as accurate as pyrosequencing (Käller et al 2006 ), and the set-up would allow inspection of the whole Y-chr phylogeny previously available (Ding et al . 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2005 ), for screening polymorphisms in a multiplex amplification of diagnostic SNP sites for 47 male dingoes, including two of the sequenced samples. The method has been shown to be as accurate as pyrosequencing (Käller et al 2006 ), and the set-up would allow inspection of the whole Y-chr phylogeny previously available (Ding et al . 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%