2007
DOI: 10.1080/02841850601067652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of positron emission tomography and lymphangiography in the diagnosis of infradiaphragmatic hodgkin's disease

Abstract: FDG-PET and LAG gave comparable results, making invasive LAG unnecessary. Furthermore, LAG, when performed before PET, can be responsible for false-positive PET results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifteen years after the introduction of CT, a prospective analysis of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma showed that while CT had a critical influence on disease stage, lymphography uniquely contributed to patient care by upstaging eight of 168 cases (313). Progressive technologic improvements in CT never overcame the complementary nature of lymphography and CT in the assessment of lymphoma, but the introduction of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning and the comparability of its results to those of lymphography (314) brought an end to the use of an otherwise superb, albeit mildly invasive, diagnostic test (315). Over the past 10 years, FDG PET/CT has emerged as the primary tool in lymphoma assessment (316).…”
Section: The Third Dimension Emerges Capabilities Expandmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fifteen years after the introduction of CT, a prospective analysis of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma showed that while CT had a critical influence on disease stage, lymphography uniquely contributed to patient care by upstaging eight of 168 cases (313). Progressive technologic improvements in CT never overcame the complementary nature of lymphography and CT in the assessment of lymphoma, but the introduction of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning and the comparability of its results to those of lymphography (314) brought an end to the use of an otherwise superb, albeit mildly invasive, diagnostic test (315). Over the past 10 years, FDG PET/CT has emerged as the primary tool in lymphoma assessment (316).…”
Section: The Third Dimension Emerges Capabilities Expandmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…between FDG-PET and lymphoangiography in patients with negative infradiaphragmatic CT scans. 1,9 In addition, multiple retrospective studies have shown that the incorporation of PET into treatment planning for lymphoma leads to significant alterations in treatment volume. [10][11][12] As a result, the inclusion of PET/CT in treatment planning is now standard practice; FDG-PET is mandatory for INRT and ideal for the application of ISRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, FDG-PET has been shown to be roughly equivalent to lymphangiography in HD staging. 114 Not surprisingly, this improved accuracy in staging lymphomas with PET-CT over conventional anatomic imaging has made functional imaging a cornerstone in this disease entity. [115][116][117] Since most lymphomas are highly FDG-avid, PET-CT's ability to show form (anatomy) and function (metabolism) is the ideal modality for early assessment of response and routine surveillance.…”
Section: Lymphomasmentioning
confidence: 97%