2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ponderomotive self-channeling and higher-order relativistic effects on intense laser beams propagating in plasma channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And Eq. (10) also directly reduces to those obtained in the weakly relativistic limit [9,[15][16][17][18][19] or in a uniform plasma [23], assuming I 0 1 or…”
Section: Analysis Of the Laser Wave Equationsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…And Eq. (10) also directly reduces to those obtained in the weakly relativistic limit [9,[15][16][17][18][19] or in a uniform plasma [23], assuming I 0 1 or…”
Section: Analysis Of the Laser Wave Equationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…(3) are usually distinguished with the effects of (linear) channel focusing, relativistic self-focusing, and ponderomotive selfchanneling [9,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. It is seen that the linear channel focusing term is always coupled with the relativistic nonlinearity through the common denominator γ , which represents the relativistic mass increase of electrons.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Laser Wave Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Ref. [10] only the transverse ponderomotive nonlinearity was considered due to using a laser beam, while it also included the longitudinal ponderomotive nonlinearity in Eq. ( 2).…”
Section: Evolution Equation Of Laser Spot Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we assume that the ponderomotive force is longitudinal, and as aforementioned, the power of electromagnetic wave P is less than the critical power P c . Therefore, one can neglect the self-channeling of laser beam in the plasma [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%