Comparison of Polyvinyl Alcohol Sponge and Gauze Packing for Nasal Fracture Treatment: An Efficacy and Safety Analysis

Abstract

Nasal fractures are commonly treated using nasal packing as an internal splint after performing closed reduction. Although gauze and polyvinyl alcohol sponge (PVAS) are both commonly used for packing, few reports have compared their efficacy and safety in nasal fracture treatment. Therefore, in this study, the authors, aimed to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of gauze packing in 208 patients and PVAS packing in 225 patients who underwent closed reduction at our hospital. The proportions of patients requiring revision surgery did not differ significantly between the PVAS and gauze groups (P=0.627). However, in comparison to the gauze group, the PVAS group displayed significantly fewer instances of uncontrolled epistaxis following packing removal, as well as fewer occurrences of dropout and loss of packing (P=0.023, P=0.007, and P<0.001, respectively). The results of logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors also showed that compared with the gauze group, the PVAS group was significantly less likely to experience packing dropout (odds ratio=0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.29, P<0.001) for which younger and older age and allergic rhinitis were independent risk factors. In conclusion, both gauze and PVAS are effective packing materials as internal splints after closed reduction of nasal bone fractures. Specifically, PVAS utilization warrants consideration in pediatric and geriatric populations, individuals with allergic rhinitis, and those at elevated risk of bleeding.