1969
DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1969.292353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Polish Versus American Lightning Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the distributions chosen for all the parameters were intended to be representative of typical distributions found in practice, it is not unexpected that the simulation results agree with the empirical data. In the case of the return stroke current, Szpor [ 1969] has found that many of the older studies underestimated the peak current by In the case of the wave shape (or model) parameters a, 13, and •t, no statistical distributions could be found even though an extensive literature search was performed in which approximately twenty sets of parameter values were found [Lefferts, 1972].…”
Section: Return Stroke Parameterssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the distributions chosen for all the parameters were intended to be representative of typical distributions found in practice, it is not unexpected that the simulation results agree with the empirical data. In the case of the return stroke current, Szpor [ 1969] has found that many of the older studies underestimated the peak current by In the case of the wave shape (or model) parameters a, 13, and •t, no statistical distributions could be found even though an extensive literature search was performed in which approximately twenty sets of parameter values were found [Lefferts, 1972].…”
Section: Return Stroke Parameterssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As a result, the above description cannot be assumed to apply to any particular locality.) ns -< 20 Chalmers [ 1967] 2.0 kA Szpor [ 1969] t o -> 0.25 •xs Uman [ 1969] 4 -< t 2 -< 200 $xs Uman [ 1969] 1 < 1 < 20 km Hagenhuth [ 1947] Brook et al [ 1962] Wagner [ 1963] E(-) = expectation •r = standard deviation to be within the outer limits normally observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that these recent derivative values are substantially larger than Berger's values given in Table 2. Peak currents for first strokes are generally thought to be in the 20 to 40 kA range with 200 kA occurring at about the IX level although there is some argument about the exact statistics (Szpor, 1969;Sargent, 1972). Return stroke veloci lightning field measurements, the luminosity of the return In the channel has a risetime (Hubert and Mouget, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%