2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of PM emissions from a gasoline direct injected (GDI) vehicle and a port fuel injected (PFI) vehicle measured by electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI) with two fuels: Gasoline and M15 methanol gasoline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of particles collected in each stage is proportional to the current value of the corresponding channel [17], which will be converted to an aerodynamic size distribution of the exhaust particles. And based on the particle density determined by the particle diameter, the particle mass distribution can also be estimated [18].…”
Section: Testing Equipmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of particles collected in each stage is proportional to the current value of the corresponding channel [17], which will be converted to an aerodynamic size distribution of the exhaust particles. And based on the particle density determined by the particle diameter, the particle mass distribution can also be estimated [18].…”
Section: Testing Equipmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datas show that PFI and GDI have similar NOx emissions. Since the mixture is heterogeneous and fuel impinges on surfaces of piston and cylinder unexpectedly, the GDI engine may form large amount of soot in the combustion process and emit much more particulates than the PFI [10] [11] . The particulate number (PN) of the PFI and the GDI engine are shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Comparison On Emissions Between the Pfi And The Gdi Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, particle measurement by electrical low-pressure impactors (ELPI) also requires particles to be charged in a corona charger, therefore faradic current produced by charged particles of each channel can be measured (Marjamaki et al, 2000). In addition, particle charging is an important process in gas purification facilities such as electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) (Kim et al, 2012;Qi and Kulkarni, 2012;Liang et al, 2013;Luond and Schlatter, 2013;Clack, 2015) and filtration facilities (Sambudi et al, 2016). Compared with bipolar charging, unipolar charging of airborne particles has attracted particular attention, primarily due to its higher charging efficiency, since the recombination of charged particles with ions of opposite polarity are avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%