2020
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.14.044516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of pixel- and object-based image analysis for tea plantation mapping using hyperspectral Gaofen-5 and synthetic aperture radar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have utilized high spatiotemporal-resolution multispectral imagery to evaluate the spatial distribution and area of tea plantations, including Li et al [83] , Huang et al [84] , and Dihkan et al [85] Various satellite resources, such as Sentinel-2 [3] and WorldView-2 [86] , have been used to examine the distribution and extraction of tea plantations. In addition, remote sensing technologies such as Landsat [87] , SAR [88] , Lidar [89] , and hyperspectral data [90] are also utilized for tea garden classification. When applying remote sensing technology to tea plantation extraction, color, texture, spectral, and terrain features are considered, including NDVI [86,91] , MNDVI [85] , EVI [88] , MNDWI [88] , LSWI [88] , GLCM texture [86] , Gabor texture [86] , DEM [88] .…”
Section: Tea Plantations Extraction and Dynamic Changes Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have utilized high spatiotemporal-resolution multispectral imagery to evaluate the spatial distribution and area of tea plantations, including Li et al [83] , Huang et al [84] , and Dihkan et al [85] Various satellite resources, such as Sentinel-2 [3] and WorldView-2 [86] , have been used to examine the distribution and extraction of tea plantations. In addition, remote sensing technologies such as Landsat [87] , SAR [88] , Lidar [89] , and hyperspectral data [90] are also utilized for tea garden classification. When applying remote sensing technology to tea plantation extraction, color, texture, spectral, and terrain features are considered, including NDVI [86,91] , MNDVI [85] , EVI [88] , MNDWI [88] , LSWI [88] , GLCM texture [86] , Gabor texture [86] , DEM [88] .…”
Section: Tea Plantations Extraction and Dynamic Changes Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, remote sensing technologies such as Landsat [87] , SAR [88] , Lidar [89] , and hyperspectral data [90] are also utilized for tea garden classification. When applying remote sensing technology to tea plantation extraction, color, texture, spectral, and terrain features are considered, including NDVI [86,91] , MNDVI [85] , EVI [88] , MNDWI [88] , LSWI [88] , GLCM texture [86] , Gabor texture [86] , DEM [88] . Furthermore, machine learning or deep learning methods coupled with multiple remote sensing technologies have been used to differentiate tea cultivars from other vegetation.…”
Section: Tea Plantations Extraction and Dynamic Changes Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the Hughes effect, hyperspectral images are not directly used in land cover classification [35]. Improving on previous studies [20,21], we selected 3 kinds of features including Minimum Noise Fraction (MNF), band, and index features.…”
Section: Spectral Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, much researchers has already combined hyperspectral, multispectral, SAR data, and the like together to identify vegetation and evaluate wetlands and soil quality; and made great progress in these research pieces. Additionally, the overall accuracy of the classification has been significantly improved [20][21][22]. The current focus of multi-source imagery classification is to optimally select feature combination [23], as too many features probably weaken the performance of the classifier and lead to unfavorable low accuracy and inefficiency [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%