2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-016-0573-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Pixel and Object Oriented Based Classification of Hyperspectral Pansharpened Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The default settings for the “composition of homogeneity criterion” were: color factor of 0.9, shape factor of 0.1, compactness factor of 0.2, and smoothness factor of 0.8. These parameters were selected using a trial and error empirical analysis (Moeller and Stefanoy, 2004; Zoleikani et al, 2017), which choose the most suitable parameters to detect small remnants of vegetation units such as the mangroves (fine scale) and discriminate spread and irregular vegetation units with different seasonal characteristic (high color and smoothness factors).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The default settings for the “composition of homogeneity criterion” were: color factor of 0.9, shape factor of 0.1, compactness factor of 0.2, and smoothness factor of 0.8. These parameters were selected using a trial and error empirical analysis (Moeller and Stefanoy, 2004; Zoleikani et al, 2017), which choose the most suitable parameters to detect small remnants of vegetation units such as the mangroves (fine scale) and discriminate spread and irregular vegetation units with different seasonal characteristic (high color and smoothness factors).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method outperformed the wavelet-based multiresolution analysis method of segmentation with an overall classification accuracy of 91.4–95.4%. Object-based classification Zoleikani et al ( 2017 ) did correlation analysis of pixel and object-based classification of hyperspectral pan-sharpened images (Hyperion and IRS-1C PAN images) for Tehran, Iran, and found that object-oriented procedure presented more accurate outcomes (90.47%) than those obtained by pixel-based classification method (77.33%). It was also observed that Haar wavelet approach has good quality in preserving spectral information as well as spatial information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Fuzzy classification Shalan et al (2003) (Pesaresi and Benediktsson 2000). Benediktsson et al (2003) Park et al (1999Park et al ( , 2001, Sanjeevi et al (2001), Saraf (1999), Teggi (2003), Zhang et al (2002) Urban and regional information extraction Ansari and Buddhiraju (2019), Benediktsson et al (2003), Kontoes et al (2000), Pathak and Dikshit (2005), Pesaresi (1999), Pesaresi and Benediktsson (2000), Rashed et al (2001Rashed et al ( , 2005, Shalan et al (2003), Zoleikani et al (2017) Change detection/change monitoring Bochenek (2005), Jain and Sharma (2019), Jensen and Im (2007), Turker and Asik (2005) Topographical mapping Jayaprasad et al (2002), Kumar et al (2004), Rao et al (2003), Srivastava et al (1996), Topan et al (2009), Zhang et al (2002) Scale and mapping issues, potential applications Armenakis and Savopol (1998), Cheng and Toutin (1998), Diwakar et al (2013), Elghazali (2006), Gautam (1997), Jayaraman et al (2000), Jensen and Cowen (1999), Joseph (1996), Meinel et al (1998), Peinsipp-Byma and Roller (1999),…”
Section: Urban and Regional Information Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Per-Pixel Classifiers: By considering the spectral similarities of a pixel with classes 73,107 it will be assigned to a class based on either parametric or non-parametric. Neural networks, SVM, and decision trees are examples of suitable techniques to enhance classifications 59 based on the per-pixel method.…”
Section: Classification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Object-Oriented Classifiers: The object-based classifier not only considers the spectral values stored in digital number (DN) but also counts on topologic (as neighborhood, contextual) and geometric (as size, shape) as classification parameters 16,73,107 . E-Cognition is an example of this type classifier.…”
Section: Classification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%