Background/Aim: In prostate cancer, postoperative radiotherapy timing is debated to avoid overtreatments and toxicities. This study compared acute and late rectal and bladder toxicities in the adjuvant and salvage setting. Patients and Methods: In total, 129 patients were analyzed in two groups: adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) and salvage radiotherapy (sRT). Results: In aRT and sRT, grade 1 (G1) acute bladder toxicities were detected in 40 and 30 patients, and grade 2 (G2) in 1 and 6; G1 late bladder toxicities were described in 30 and 20, and G2 in 6 and 2, respectively. In aRT and sRT, acute G1 rectal toxicities were reported in 18 and 27 patients, and G2 in 5 and 4, respectively. Late rectal G1 toxicities were observed in 10 patients, G2 in 6 and G3 in 1 in the aRT. In sRT, 8 patients and 1 developed G1 and G2 toxicities, respectively. Regarding bladder toxicity, a higher incidence occurred in aRT; late toxicity was lower in sRT. Conclusion: Adjuvant and salvage RT in prostate cancer treatment resulted in acceptable toxicities.The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) after radical prostatectomy has been previously demonstrated in three randomized trials (1-6) prescribing aRT in cases of seminal vesicles invasion (SVI), positive surgical margins (PSM) or extracapsular extension (ECE). aRT has demonstrated to obtain reductions in biochemical recurrence, local recurrence, and clinical progression (7, 8).Postoperative salvage radiotherapy (sRT) should be proposed in cases of biochemical [prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels of 0.2 ng/ml or higher] or local recurrence. A low pretreatment serum PSA level was the most important factor of sRT response (9-11).However, the role and timing of postoperative treatment still remains a current, debated and interesting argument, with the possibility of treatment recommendation only in recurrences, in order to avoid overtreatment. Furthermore, RT delay could reduce treatment-related toxicity, improving quality of life (12, 13). In fact, urinary incontinence and urethral stricture formation, that could occur after radical prostatectomy, could be intensified with radiotherapy (14).Furthermore, highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and image guided radiotherapy (IGRT), in contrast to standard 3D-CRT, in both adjuvant and salvage settings, could reduce gastrointestinal and genitourinary adverse events (15-17).Three randomized trials compared adjuvant and salvage treatment and suggested early salvage RT as the preferable option for avoiding overtreatment and possible side-effects, whereas aRT does not improve PSA-free survival (18-20). Also, the prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of the ARTISTIC collaboration confirmed these results. This meta-analysis included 2,153 patients of the RADICALS, GETUG-AFU 17, and RAVES trials, in order to assess aRT effects versus those of sRT (21). The proportion of patients free of biochemical progression at 5 years was high, approxima...