2003
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2003.1228509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of physical and software-implemented fault injection techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
46
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Perturbation, repeatability, monitoring-time resolution, controllability are recognized as some of the most significant properties for fault injection tools [10], [11], [12], [13]; while designing both fault injection tools and experiments, typically relevant efforts are spent to properly address them. As examples in the field of SWIFI, we briefly mention the tools ORCHESTRA [14], XCEPTION [15] and LOKI [16] and an experiment [17] performed using the FTAPE tool.…”
Section: Guidelines and Good Practices For Swifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perturbation, repeatability, monitoring-time resolution, controllability are recognized as some of the most significant properties for fault injection tools [10], [11], [12], [13]; while designing both fault injection tools and experiments, typically relevant efforts are spent to properly address them. As examples in the field of SWIFI, we briefly mention the tools ORCHESTRA [14], XCEPTION [15] and LOKI [16] and an experiment [17] performed using the FTAPE tool.…”
Section: Guidelines and Good Practices For Swifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these are also slow, the experimental approach of fault injection has been used instead to test real systems under realistic faults. Fault injection can be HW [12,3,4] or SW implemented [2-6, 13, 14]. In HW-implemented injection, faults are injected physically by electromagnetic interference and radiation [12] or through the circuit pins [3,4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault injection can be HW [12,3,4] or SW implemented [2-6, 13, 14]. In HW-implemented injection, faults are injected physically by electromagnetic interference and radiation [12] or through the circuit pins [3,4]. Although these inject real hardware faults that can reach all locations, they lack flexibility and are difficult to operate and control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methodologies, which require a prototype to introduce the faults into the system, are further divided into Hardware Implemented Fault Injection (HWIFI) and Software Implemented Fault Injection (SWIFI) [13] [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%