2020
DOI: 10.5185/amlett.2020.121584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Photocatalytic Efficiency of TiO2 and In2S3 Thin Films under UV and Visible Light Irradiance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported band gaps of the anatase and rutile structures are 3.2 eV and 3.0 eV, respectively, for bulk TiO 2 [22]. The constant value, around 3.32 eV, at R O2 = 20-40% could be derived from the anatase structure, where the difference of 0.12 eV larger than 3.2 eV is explained by the tendency that the band gap of thin films is generally wider than that of bulk [23,24]. The relatively smaller values of band gap at R O2 = 5-10% should originate from the rutile structure, which was slightly detected in XRD results.…”
Section: Optical Transmittance Spectramentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The reported band gaps of the anatase and rutile structures are 3.2 eV and 3.0 eV, respectively, for bulk TiO 2 [22]. The constant value, around 3.32 eV, at R O2 = 20-40% could be derived from the anatase structure, where the difference of 0.12 eV larger than 3.2 eV is explained by the tendency that the band gap of thin films is generally wider than that of bulk [23,24]. The relatively smaller values of band gap at R O2 = 5-10% should originate from the rutile structure, which was slightly detected in XRD results.…”
Section: Optical Transmittance Spectramentioning
confidence: 94%