1998
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.1998.10414423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of phosphorus deficiency effects on the growth parameters of mashbean, mungbean, and soybean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreased shoot growth in P‐deficient plants assayed here may be a direct consequence of a reduction of leaf expansion (Table 1) and reduced leaf initiation, which is in accordance with previous reports for this crop (Lynch et al 1991, Liao and Yan 1999). The reduction of leaf area at low P‐application levels (more severe in our P 0 treatment) was also found by Chaudhary and Fujita (1998) in different legumes. However, results also showed an increase in chlorophyll levels in leaves of plants cultured in low P treatments (in coincidence with a lower leaf area), which suggests the possibility that low P levels could inhibit the leaf cell expansion, whereas the chlorophyll synthesis is not affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decreased shoot growth in P‐deficient plants assayed here may be a direct consequence of a reduction of leaf expansion (Table 1) and reduced leaf initiation, which is in accordance with previous reports for this crop (Lynch et al 1991, Liao and Yan 1999). The reduction of leaf area at low P‐application levels (more severe in our P 0 treatment) was also found by Chaudhary and Fujita (1998) in different legumes. However, results also showed an increase in chlorophyll levels in leaves of plants cultured in low P treatments (in coincidence with a lower leaf area), which suggests the possibility that low P levels could inhibit the leaf cell expansion, whereas the chlorophyll synthesis is not affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…ATP was extracted from nodules and roots by the methanol/trichloroacetic acid method of Khym (1974) and the perchloric acid method of Rychter et al (1992), respectively. Extracts previously neutralized with tryoctylamine were assayed for ATP content using the luciferin‐luciferase reaction (Chaudhary and Fujita 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). In legumes, P influences the number, weight, and activity of nodules (de Mooy and Pesek, 1966; Cassman et , 1980;Matsunaga and Matsumoto, 1984;Konno et al, 1990;Chaudhary and Fujita, 1998;Singh et al, 2005). In our pot experiments, nodule number increased with the amount of P applied (Table 1), and the amount of nitrogen accumulated increased with the P accumulation level even when nitrogen fertilizer was not applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The roles of P in legume development are root proliferation, increase of nodulation number and weight, and stimulation of nodule activity (de Mooy and Pesek, 1966;Cassman et al, 1980;Matsunaga and Matsumoto, 1984;Konno et al, 1990;Chaudhary and Fujita, 1998;Singh et al, 2005). Phosphorus deficiency in legumes reduces leaf area, photosynthetic rate, and the numbers of nodes and branches (Qiu and Israel, 1992;Chaudhary et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, comparable P‐mediated increases in N content in mungbean were reported before ( Hayat et al, 2008). Mungbean responds strongly to applied P ( Singh and Pandey , 2003), particularly in highly P‐deficient soils, in terms of grain yield ( Chaudhary and Fujita , 1998), N accumulation ( Gunawardena et al, 1992), and seed P content ( Naeem et al, 2006). While effects of P application on mungbean performance were greater on moderately fertile soils, the carry‐over effects on rice were largely limited to the highly infertile soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%