1999
DOI: 10.1080/00103629909370270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of phosphate rock and triple superphosphate on a phosphorus‐deficient Kenyan soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tithonia can therefore be used as a substitute for urea in integrated soil fertility management systems. The RAE of MPR in our study was generally high and is consistent with other studies in the area [4,25] that have concluded that MPR is a reactive PR and is therefore suitable for direct application. The better performance of MPR at Khwisero than Nyabeda is consistent with the available P being higher at Khwisero due to higher dissolution of MPR occasioned by the lower pH at this site as earlier discussed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Tithonia can therefore be used as a substitute for urea in integrated soil fertility management systems. The RAE of MPR in our study was generally high and is consistent with other studies in the area [4,25] that have concluded that MPR is a reactive PR and is therefore suitable for direct application. The better performance of MPR at Khwisero than Nyabeda is consistent with the available P being higher at Khwisero due to higher dissolution of MPR occasioned by the lower pH at this site as earlier discussed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The S was introduced to provide an acidic environment to enhance the dissolution of PR (Bromfield, 1975). TSP at different rates was not included because past work had shown that TSP gave comparable yields to MPR (Okalebo and Woomer, 1994;Mutuo et al, 1999). The MPR used is a biogenic type originating from Arusha, Tanzania with 13 % total P and 3 % neutral ammonium-citrate-soluble P contents (Van Kauwenberg, 1991).…”
Section: Greenhouse Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quando se dispõe de uma curva de resposta da planta a aplicações do superfosfato triplo, é preferível usar o EqST (Goedert & Lobato, 1984), escolhendo-se a dose de P 2 O 5 que proporcione um rendimento em torno de 80 % da produção máxima (Sanzonowicz & Goedert, 1986). Dos extratores usados para avaliar a disponibilidade de P no solo, o Mehlich-1 superestima a quantidade do P disponibilizada dos FN aplicados no solo (Yost et al, 1982;Almeida et al, 1996), sendo a resina de troca aniônica (RTA) mais apropriada para essa finalidade (Braga et al, 1991;Mutuo, 1999;Silva & Raij, 1999). Entretanto, algumas pesquisas têm mostrado que o P-Mehlich-1 apresentou altas correlações com o P absorvido pela planta e o P-RTA (Vasconcelos et al, 1986b;Freitas et al, 1995;Moreira & Malavolta, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified