2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of phase velocity in trabecular bone mimicking-phantoms by time domain numerical (EFIT) and analytical multiple scattering approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the phase velocity was found to increase with increasing particles' volume concentrations. Although the variation of the phase velocity as a function of frequency and volume concentration was in excellent consistency with previous experimental and numerical findings [2,19], this was not the case when the particle diameter increased. An almost constant phase velocity with increasing particle diameter has been also found in [20] investigating the influence of porosity and pore size on the ultrasonic properties of cancellous bone using a phantom material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the phase velocity was found to increase with increasing particles' volume concentrations. Although the variation of the phase velocity as a function of frequency and volume concentration was in excellent consistency with previous experimental and numerical findings [2,19], this was not the case when the particle diameter increased. An almost constant phase velocity with increasing particle diameter has been also found in [20] investigating the influence of porosity and pore size on the ultrasonic properties of cancellous bone using a phantom material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This anomalous behavior of the frequency dependence of the phase velocity has been also reported in various studies in cancellous bone [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Despite the fact that several proposals have been made to explain this velocity trend, no conclusion has been drawn yet.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…According to(Marutyan et al, 2006), the apparent negative dispersion of ultrasonic waves propagating in bone can arise from the interference between fast and slow longitudinal modes, each exhibiting positive dispersion. The results of IEMA were in excellent consistency with the observations of(Molero et al, 2012;Haiat et al, 2008;…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…2008;Marutyan et al, 2006;Waters et al, 2005). Nevertheless, a negative dispersion has been also reported in various experimental and numerical studies investigating wave dispersion in cancellous bone(Molero et al, 2012;Bauer et al, 2008;Anderson et al, 2008;Haiat et al, 2008;Wear et al, 2005). According to(Marutyan et al, 2006), the apparent negative dispersion of ultrasonic waves propagating in bone can arise from the interference between fast and slow longitudinal modes, each exhibiting positive dispersion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A heterogeneous porous structure in a bone tissue is similar to condition (ii), which may explain why the Nakagami parameter of the mastoids are smaller than 1 (i.e., pre-Rayleigh distribution). In particular, the temporal bone is a hard tissue; thus, multiple scattering has to be considered 36 37 . Multiple scattering is also a possible factor causing a high degree of variance in the echo signal amplitude, thus making the backscattered signals follow pre-Rayleigh distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%